after all that waiting, tomorrow i’ll buy an old-gen camera after all.
Warning – even though it’s been more than 6 months since the last post, this is almost entirely all camera geekery… no fun personal updates here. Or that’s the plan anyways. Let’s see how the post goes…
So there are two kinds of D-SLRs (big digital cameras, the biggest kind you see in normal stores, with removable lenses): ones with APS-C size sensors, and full-frame sensors. The former is the default: this sensor is roughly 4 times smaller in surface-area than the full-frame sensor, which refers to being the same size as 35mm film. Which no one seems to use much anymore, so it’s odd that the tech is always in comparison to a bygone, but hey there are still film diehards out there so maybe this is an ironic tribute.
I’ve been waiting over a year to buy a full-frame camera, because you need one when you do professional things like weddings (which I started doing not too long ago). I’m a Nikon guy (primarily because they feel so much better in my hands), and Nikon (like Canon) has a roughly 3-4 year release-cycle for new full-frame cameras. Nikon has two that are within my reach (and a third that’s not): the really expensive, and the expensive. The lesser one, the D700, cost about $2700 when it was launched, and the more expensive one, the D3 and then D3s, cost about $5000. My plan had been to wait for the successor to the D700, believed to be the D800, and buy that. It should have been out in late 2011, but thanks to a massive tsunami and ensuing nuclear chaos, and then a big flood in Thailand on top of that, it still isn’t out. The D800 is rumoured to be announced on Feb. 12, with a rumoured price-tag of $4k.
At xmas, I played with the camera my mum bought, the Nikon V1. It’s a smallish camera, one of the new “mirrorless” cameras. It’s not much bigger than a pocket camera, but it has interchangeable lenses. And after playing with it, one thing became apparent: these new mirrorless cameras have a whole lot of really useful innovative tech that their bigger cousins from upstate clearly don’t have! Things like a new hybrid focus system, which can (as I understand it) basically focus anywhere on the sensor (traditional DSLRs are limited to certain “points” in the image), and do so really really fast (I was astounded how fast the focus on the V1 is, even in very adverse conditions like harsh contrast or very low light). They also have impressive shake reduction: i have unsteady hands and generally shoot no slower than 1/50 without a tripod, but with the V1 I could shoot 1/5 handheld! That might have been a lucky day where I had less coffee, but it really impressed me.
Now here’s the kicker about all this cool new tech in the V1: last week Nikon released the D4, their brand-new flagship DSLR, clocking in with a massive price-tag of $6k. And what do you get for the extra $1k over the D3s’ price? 4 megapixels, and that’s about it! There are other things, sure — the usual improved ISO range & performance, better metering, yawnity-yawn-yawn-yawn. But how many cool new techs like the V1 are implemented in the D4? Zip, zero, zilch. This is Nikon’s flagship — you better believe that the D800 is not going to have cool tech that the d4 doesn’t have. That means the D800, while rumoured to have a zillion (36) megapixels, will have only that — more pixels. No cool new tech. And for thousands above the cost of the D700 (if that rumour is true), that made me think… do I need a D800?
Consider also that even if the D800 is announced on or around Feb. 12, the earliest it would start shipping is a month later. Then it’ll take up to 3 months to get to switzerland. So i’d get one around mid-summertime — way later than needed for weddings and other jobs, so i’d be borrowing again, or renting if my one acquaintance who’s kind enough to lend me the D700 realizes that he doesn’t need to be so incredibly nice
Tie these things together, and I’m buying a D700 tomorrow, used, for about $1700. Sure, i’d like 36mp, but I can’t wait till mid-summer, and the extra thousands of $ beyond the price of the D700 is only worth it to me if there is some cool new tech included, like that which the V1 impressed me with. Since that ain’t happening, I ain’t waitin. Then again, Nikon could pleasantly surprise me, in which case I would sell the D700 for hopefully a small loss, and buy the D800 after all. But with all the other equipment I need to buy (I skipped the whole line of reasoning about how I need to buy a portrait lens and a lighting system this year, and both of those are in jeopardy if I buy a $4k D800!), it doesn’t seem likely.
I’m really, really looking forward to owning a full-frame camera.
